lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 7 Mar 2006 13:39:22 +0530
FromDipankar Sarma <>
SubjectRe: VFS nr_files accounting
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:00:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:53:14 +1100> > > The other thing that is typically done for regressions like these
> > close to release time is to revert the offending changes. I figure
> > that in this case, such an option is probably _more_ risky.> > Especially since we're talking about something that went into
> 2.6.14

Without a doubt, yes. Waaaay more risky. Compared to that the
rcu-batch-tuning and fix-file-counting are a cakewalk. It would
however be nice if Christoph or Viro gives the file counting
patch a look-over just so that I didn't break any sysctl
stuff.
Thanks
Dipankar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-07 08:13    [W:0.027 / U:0.410 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans