![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:00:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:53:14 +1100> > > The other thing that is typically done for regressions like these > > close to release time is to revert the offending changes. I figure > > that in this case, such an option is probably _more_ risky.> > Especially since we're talking about something that went into > 2.6.14 Without a doubt, yes. Waaaay more risky. Compared to that the rcu-batch-tuning and fix-file-counting are a cakewalk. It would however be nice if Christoph or Viro gives the file counting patch a look-over just so that I didn't break any sysctl stuff. Thanks Dipankar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-07 08:13 [W:0.027 / U:0.410 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||