[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers
On Maw, 2006-03-07 at 20:09 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Alan Cox <> wrote:
> > Better meaningful example would be barriers versus an IRQ handler. Which
> > leads nicely onto section 2
> Yes, except that I can't think of one that's feasible that doesn't have to do
> with I/O - which isn't a problem if you are using the proper accessor
> functions.

We get them off bus masters for one and you can construct silly versions
of the other.

There are several kernel instances of

while(*ptr != HAVE_RESPONDED && time_before(jiffies, timeout))

where we wait for hardware to bus master respond when it is fast and
doesn't IRQ.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-08 01:35    [W:0.125 / U:0.832 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site