![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:39:04PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> > Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:08:47 +0530 > > > Great. I look forward to hearing from you about the results > > with your test case. > > It works quite fine so far, I haven't seen the filp exhaustion > nor a highly fragmented filp SLAB. Good to hear that. > Instead, I'm not hitting other bugs that are of my own doing > on Niagara, which is what I wanted to accomplish with these > stress tests in the first place :-) Not good :) > I think we should seriously consider these patches for 2.6.16 Isn't it a little too late in the 2.6.16 cycle ? I would have liked a little more time in -mm. Anyway, it is Linus' call. I can refresh the patches and submit against latest mainline if Linus and Andrew want. Thanks Dipankar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-07 06:45 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||