![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> writes: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:59:50PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > So that hack apparently improves the bucket distribution quite a bit, but > > look, the bad old linear systime creep is still very obvious. For that > > there is no substitute for lots of buckets. > Yes, I think the way to go right now is to allocate an array of pages and > index into that. We can make the array size a mount option so that the > default can be something reasonable ;) Did you actually do some statistics how long the hash chains are? Just increasing hash tables blindly has other bad side effects, like increasing cache misses. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-07 03:42 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||