![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 01:24 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > This is disgusting. Please, don't pile more and more complexity into > sysctl_table - it's already choke-full of it and needs to be simplified, > not to grow more crap. I don't completely disagree. It certainly isn't the most elegant approach I've ever seen. Any ideas on ways we could simplify it? I was thinking that we could get rid of the .data member and allow access only via the mechanism I just introduced. It would be pretty easy to make some macros to generate "simple" access functions for the existing global variables. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-07 01:59 [W:0.249 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||