![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, Am Sonntag 05 März 2006 09:34 schrieb Andrew Morton: > That check was changed from > > "If this STA doesn't use WPA and that AP does, then bale" > > into > > "If this STA does use WPA and that AP doesn't then bale". > > So a theory would be that your AP isn't filling in those WPA length fields. > I see no reason why we should permit that to disable WEP? problem is that wpa_supplicant needs to set wpa_enabled unconditionally, so with this change it hasn't been possible to connect to non-WPA networks using WPA supplicant. For the discussion on the IPW list, see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114004412300002&r=1&w=2 . 1.0.12 fixes this by removing the check entirely. James: Does it makes sense for you to push 1.1.0 out to netdev soon, or better just the fix for this? Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-06 12:10 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||