Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:33:38 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: smp_locks reference_discarded errors |
| |
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 10:40:42AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > > came out of a 'make buildcheck' a day or two ago (the following day, > > > Sam nuked reference_discarded.pl in favour of it being done > > > magically somewhere else (I've not looked into how its done now). > > The check is part of modpost now. modpost is only used when building > > modules but that holds true for most builds anyway therefore I did not > > move it to a separate executable. > >... > > This doesn't sound good. > > This means that we have no longer any tool that warns us about e.g. > references from non-__exit code to __exit code [1]? > [1] __exit, not __{dev,cpu,mem}exit
It does warn for this also. The test I have carried out has mostly been on allmodconfig builds though. I assume you are worried for the case when a module is built-in and the __exit section is discarded - or?
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |