Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:10:37 -0800 | | From | Chris Wright <> | | Subject | Re: Synchronizing Bit operations V2 |
* David Mosberger-Tang (David.Mosberger@acm.org) wrote: > I have to agree with Hans and I'd much prefer making the mode part of > the operation's > name and not a parameter. Besides being The Right Thing, it saves a > lot of typing. > For example: > > + set_bit_mode(nr, addr, MODE_ATOMIC); > > would simply become > > + set_bit_atomic(nr, addr);
That's the approach Xen took as well.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |