lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] splice: add support for SPLICE_F_MOVE flag
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> wrote:
>
> commit 5abc97aa25b2c41413b3a520faee83f2282d9f18
> tree 4ba13ae0e91f15d02986df7cdca5e9455212d7d4
> parent 5274f052e7b3dbd81935772eb551dfd0325dfa9d
> author Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:16:46 +0200
> committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 04:28:18 -0800
>
> [PATCH] splice: add support for SPLICE_F_MOVE flag
>
> This enables the caller to migrate pages from one address space page
> cache to another. In buzz word marketing, you can do zero-copy file
> copies!
>
> ...
>
> +static int page_cache_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *info,
> + struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> +{
> + struct page *page = buf->page;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!PageLocked(page));
> + WARN_ON(!PageUptodate(page));
> +
> + if (!remove_mapping(page_mapping(page), page))
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (PageLRU(page)) {
> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + BUG_ON(!PageLRU(page));
> + __ClearPageLRU(page);
> + del_page_from_lru(zone, page);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + }
> +
> + buf->stolen = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}

hm. There's a reason why it is no longer necessary to recheck PG_lru after
taking the zone->lock, but I'm too lazy to go back through the changelogs
and we seem to have forgotten to add comments, so I'll cc Nick instead ;)

I worry that the page might still be under writeback when we get here.
Probably we'll get lucky because whoever is writing the page probably holds
a ref on it (BIOs will do this), but a wait_on_page_writeback() after
locking the page might be prudent.

> static void page_cache_pipe_buf_unmap(struct pipe_inode_info *info,
> struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> {
> - unlock_page(buf->page);
> + if (!buf->stolen)
> + unlock_page(buf->page);
> kunmap(buf->page);
> }

There go our chances of ever getting rid of kmap(). Is it not feasible to
use atomic kmaps throughout this code?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-31 02:36    [W:0.038 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site