Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: NFS/Kernel Problem: getfh failed: Operation not permitted | From | Trond Myklebust <> | Date | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:12:31 -0500 |
| |
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 10:13 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 09:50 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> I tried an exportfs -rv and it did not help. Any other suggestions? > > > > Did the output from 'exportfs -rv' match with the contents > > of /etc/exports? If so, did it also match with the contents > > of /var/lib/nfs/xtab and /proc/fs/nfs/exports? > > > > Cheers, > > Trond > > > > In the /etc/exports file, I have an entry that looks like this: > /path specific-host-001(ro,root_squash,no_sync) > /path specific-host-002((ro,root_squash,no_sync) > /path *(ro,root_squash,no_sync) > > So while there are only three entries, there are: > > cat /proc/fs/nfs/exports | wc -> 566 > cat /var/lib/nfs/xtab | wc -> 564
Yes, but do they match? /var/lib/nfs/xtab and /proc/fs/nfs/exports are supposed to differ in that 'exportfs' will fill in a few default options. The question is whether there are entries for specific-host-001, specific-host-002,...
> Entries per file. > > Is this more of a kernel or nfsutils issue at this point?
More likely to be an nfs-utils issue.
Cheers, Trond
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |