![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> On Thu, Mar 02 2006, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thursday 02 March 2006 12:10, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > I'm waiting for Andi to render an opinion on the problem. > It should have > > > no corruption implications, the PIO path will handle > arbitrarily large > > > requests. I'm assuming the mapped sg table is correct, > just odd looking > > > for some reason. > > > > I was waiting for feedback if iommu=nomerge changes > anything. With that option > > the IOMMU code will never touch the layout of the sg list, > just rewrite > > ->dma_address > > Andy already reported that it didn't change anything. The > output doesn't > looked merged anyways in most of the cases, it's the offsetting that > looks odd. > Indeed I did: <http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/1/109> -- Andy, BlueArc Engineering - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-03 10:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||