lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDuncan Sands <>
SubjectRe: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
DateFri, 3 Mar 2006 09:12:11 +0100
> Have you ever considered how many TDs have to be allocated to transfer
> a data buffer this big? No, seriously. If your application cannot deliver
> the tranfer speeds with 16KB URBs, we ought to consider if the combination
> of our USB stack, usbfs, libusb and the application ought to get serious
> performance enhancing surgery. The problem is obviously in the software
> overhead.

If you queue a large number of 16KB urbs, rather than one jumbo urb,
does that make any difference to the number of TDs allocated?  I thought
TDs were allocated for all queued urbs at the moment they are queued...

Ciao,

Duncan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-03 08:14    [from the cache]
©2003-2008