[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] splice support
    Linus Torvalds <> wrote:
    > > - why is the `flags' arg to sys_splice() unsigned long? Can it be `int'?
    > flags are always unsigned long, haven't you noticed?

    <does `man 2 open', gets confused>

    > Besides, they should
    > never be signed, if you do bitmasks and shifting on them: "int" is
    > strictly worse than "unsigned" when we're talking flags.

    Sure, but is there any gain in making flags 64-bit on 64-bit machines when
    we cannot use more than 32 bits in there anyway?

    > Right now "flags" doesn't do anything at all, and you should just pass in
    > zero.

    In that case perhaps we should be enforcing flags==0 so that future
    flags-using applications will reliably fail on old flags-not-understanding

    But that won't work if we later define a bit in flags to mean "behave like
    old kernels used to". So perhaps we should require that bits 0-15 of
    `flags' be zero and not care about bits 16-31.

    IOW: it might be best to make `flags' just go away, and add new syscalls in
    the future as appropriate.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-30 04:11    [W:0.040 / U:41.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site