Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:53:42 -0600 | | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps |
Quoting Kirill Korotaev (dev@sw.ru): > >>so IMHO, we should make a kernel branch (Eric or Sam > >>are probably willing to maintain that), which we keep > >>in-sync with mainline (not necessarily git, but at > >>least snapshot wise), where we put all the patches > >>we agree on, and each party should then adjust the > >>existing solution to this kernel, so we get some deep > >>testing in the process, and everybody can see if it > >>'works' for him or not ... > > > >ACK. A collection of patches that we can all agree > >on sounds like something worth aiming for. > > > >It looks like Kirill last round of patches can form > >a nucleus for that. So far I have seem plenty of technical > >objects but no objections to the general direction. > yup, I will fix everything and will come with a set of patches for IPC, > so we could select which way is better to do it :) > > >So agreement appears possible. > Nice to hear this! > > Eric, we have a GIT repo on openvz.org already: > http://git.openvz.org > > we will create a separate branch also called -acked, where patches > agreed upon will go.
That's ok by me. If a more neutral name/site were preferred, we could use the sf.net set we had finally gotten around to setting up - www.sf.net/projects/lxc (LinuX Containers). Unfortunately that would likely be just a quilt patch repository.
A wiki + git repository would be ideal.
-serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |