![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > Nick, will be glad to shed some light on it. > Thanks very much Kirill. I don't think I'm qualified to make any decisions about this, so I don't want to detract from the real discussions, but I just had a couple more questions: > First of all, what it does which low level virtualization can't: > - it allows to run 100 containers on 1GB RAM > (it is called containers, VE - Virtual Environments, > VPS - Virtual Private Servers). > - it has no much overhead (<1-2%), which is unavoidable with hardware > virtualization. For example, Xen has >20% overhead on disk I/O. Are any future hardware solutions likely to improve these problems? > > OS kernel virtualization > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Is this considered secure enough that multiple untrusted VEs are run on production systems? What kind of users want this, who can't use alternatives like real VMs? > Summary of previous discussions on LKML > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Have their been any discussions between the groups pushing this virtualization, and important kernel developers who are not part of a virtualization effort? Ie. is there any consensus about the future of these patches? Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-28 13:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||