Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:24:47 +0200 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup |
| |
Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Mar 26, 2006, at 08:29:49, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Kyle Moffett wrote: >>> Well I guess you could call it UABI, but that might also imply that >>> it's _userspace_ that defines the interface, instead of the kernel. >>> Since the headers themselves are rather tightly coupled with the >>> kernel, I think I'll stick with the KABI name for now (unless >>> somebody can come up with a better one, of course :-D). >> >> How about __linux, or __linux_abi? There are ABIs for other >> components, and other OSes. Linux is the name of the project after all. > > The other thing that I quickly noticed while writing up the patches is > that it's kind of tedious typing __kabi_ over and over again. I > actually did first try with __linux_abi_ but the typing effort and > finger cramps made me give up on that really quickly. #define _LA(x) __linux_abi_##x
struct _LA(whatever) { int foo; int bar; };
struct _LA(another) { ... };
#undef _LA
?
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |