lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Security downgrade? CONFIG_HOTPLUG required in 2.6.16?
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:03:03PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I had this config'ed out in 2.6.15 for machine that didn't have
> any hotpluggable devices. It is also configured with all the
> modules it needs and has kernel-module loading disabled.
>
> What has changed in 2.6.16 that my "static" machine now
> needs hotplugging? As I understand it, hotplugging requires
> application-level support code (in /etc/) and a special
> application level "demon" to run in order to support these
> requests.
>
> I'd prefer my kernel not to be dependent on a run-time demon
> to load "arbitrary" (user defined) segments of code that could
> come from any source -- usually outside the vanilla kernel tree.
>
> If I don't want a specific kernel or machine to be dynamically
> reconfigurable after boot, why do I need to build in a mechanism for
> runtime loading of modules?

- hotplugging devices != module loading
- CONFIG_HOTPLUG does not load any code into the kernel.
- hotplugging devices can work without any userspace support

As an example, hotplugging an USB hard disk works fine with
CONFIG_MODULES=n and without any userspace support (assuming
a static /dev).

> Linda

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-25 20:29    [W:0.085 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site