Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:04:06 +1100 |
| |
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:02, Mike Galbraith wrote: > I've separated the buglet fix parts from the rest, so there are four > patches instead of two. I've also hidden the knobs, though for the > testing phase at least, I personally think it would be better to leave > the knobs there for people to twiddle. Something Willy said indicated > to me that 'credit' would be more palatable than 'grace', so I've > renamed and updated comments to match. I think it might look better, > but can't know since 'grace' was perfectly fine for my taste buds ;-) > > I'll post as soon as I do some more cleanup pondering and verification.
Great. I suggest making the base patch have the values hard coded as #defines and then have a patch on top that turns those into userspace tunables we can hand tune while in -mm which can then be dropped if/when merged upstream.
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |