lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation
Date
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:02, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I've separated the buglet fix parts from the rest, so there are four
> patches instead of two. I've also hidden the knobs, though for the
> testing phase at least, I personally think it would be better to leave
> the knobs there for people to twiddle. Something Willy said indicated
> to me that 'credit' would be more palatable than 'grace', so I've
> renamed and updated comments to match. I think it might look better,
> but can't know since 'grace' was perfectly fine for my taste buds ;-)
>
> I'll post as soon as I do some more cleanup pondering and verification.

Great. I suggest making the base patch have the values hard coded as #defines
and then have a patch on top that turns those into userspace tunables we can
hand tune while in -mm which can then be dropped if/when merged upstream.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-24 06:06    [W:0.120 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site