Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:21:01 +1100 |
| |
On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:07, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Nothing conclusive. Some of the difference may be because interbench > has a dependency on the idle sleep path popping tasks in a prio 16 > instead of 18. Some of it may be because I'm not restricting IO, doing > that makes a bit of difference. Some of it is definitely plain old > jitter.
Thanks for those! Just a clarification please
> virgin
I assume 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 ?
> throttle patches with throttling disabled
With your full patchset but no throttling enabled?
> minus idle sleep
Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep ?
> minus don't restrict IO
Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep-restrictio ?
Can you please email the latest separate patches so we can see them in isolation? I promise I won't ask for any more interbench numbers any time soon :)
Thanks!
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |