Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:06:06 +1100 | From | Peter Williams <> | Subject | Re: cpu scheduler merge plans |
| |
Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:57:06AM +1100, kernel@kolivas.org wrote: > >>Quoting Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>: >> >>># >>># "strange load balancing problems": pwil3058@bigpond.net.au >>>sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch >>>sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch >>>x86-dont-use-cpuid2-to-determine-cache-info-if-cpuid4-is-supported.patch > > > I'd like to see the three above patches in 2.6.17. Peters "strange load > balancing problems" seems to be a false alarm(this patch will have > minimal impact on a single core cpu because of domain degeneration..) and > doesn't happen on recent -mm kernels..
I agree. This is no longer a problem and certainly shouldn't prevent the above patches going in to 2.6.17.
Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |