lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: cpu scheduler merge plans
Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:57:06AM +1100, kernel@kolivas.org wrote:
>
>>Quoting Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>:
>>
>>>#
>>># "strange load balancing problems": pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
>>>sched-new-sched-domain-for-representing-multi-core.patch
>>>sched-fix-group-power-for-allnodes_domains.patch
>>>x86-dont-use-cpuid2-to-determine-cache-info-if-cpuid4-is-supported.patch
>
>
> I'd like to see the three above patches in 2.6.17. Peters "strange load
> balancing problems" seems to be a false alarm(this patch will have
> minimal impact on a single core cpu because of domain degeneration..) and
> doesn't happen on recent -mm kernels..

I agree. This is no longer a problem and certainly shouldn't prevent
the above patches going in to 2.6.17.

Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-23 23:08    [W:0.383 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site