| Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:01:38 -0500 (EST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/34] mm: Page Replacement Policy Framework |
| |
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 2.6.16-rc6 seems to do OK. I assume the cyclic patterns exploit the lru > worst case thing? Has consideration been given to tweaking the existing > code, detect the situation and work avoid the problem?
This can certainly be done. Rate-based clock-pro isn't that far away mechanically from the current 2.6 code and can be introduced in small steps.
I'll just have to make it work again ;)
-- All Rights Reversed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|