lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] Reducing average ext2 fsck time through fs-wide dirty bit]
Valerie Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 11:09:18AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:10 -0800, Valerie Henson wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am working on reducing the average time spent on fscking ext2 file
> > > systems. My initial take on the problem is to avoid fscking when the
> >
> > Just curious, why are you teaching ext2 same tricks that are in ext3 ?
> > Is there a reason behind improving ext2 ? Are there any benefits
> > of not using ext3 instead ?
>
> ext2 is simpler and faster than ext3 in many cases. This is sort of
> cheating; ext2 is simpler and faster because it makes no effort to
> maintain on-disk consistency and can skip annoying things like, oh,
> reserving space in the journal. I am looking for ways to make ext2
> cheat even more.
>

But it might be feasible to knock up an ext3-- in which all the journal
operations are stubbed out.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-23 03:01    [W:0.347 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site