lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching
    * Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote:
    > Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a
    > module? Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table,
    > used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had
    > to be GPL)? Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option
    > ROM space and has a C interface.

    Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free
    form that normal kernel API's have.

    thanks,
    -chris
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-23 01:42    [W:0.021 / U:30.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site