Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:40:06 -0800 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching |
| |
* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote: > Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a > module? Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table, > used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had > to be GPL)? Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option > ROM space and has a C interface.
Yeah, point is the interface is normal C API, and has the similar free form that normal kernel API's have.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |