![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > So it's that time again. We need to decide which of the queued sched > patches should be merged into 2.6.17. > > I have: > > sched-fix-task-interactivity-calculation.patch > small-schedule-microoptimization.patch > # > sched-implement-smpnice.patch > sched-smpnice-apply-review-suggestions.patch > sched-smpnice-fix-average-load-per-run-queue-calculations.patch > sched-store-weighted-load-on-up.patch > sched-add-discrete-weighted-cpu-load-function.patch > sched-add-above-background-load-function.patch > # Suresh had problems I really need to review smpnice. I'll try to get on to that soon. I don't have any problems with the non-multiprocessor stuff (Con's and Mike's patches). -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-23 00:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||