Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:51:54 -0600 | From | "K.R. Foley" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.16-rt1 |
| |
Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:10 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote: > >> Found something interesting. Having Wakeup latency timing turned on >> makes a HUGE difference. I turned it off and recompiled and now I am >> seeing numbers back in line with what I expected from 2.6.16-rt4. Sorry, >> but I had no idea it would make that much difference. I don't have a >> complete run yet, but I have seen enough to know that I am not seeing >> tons of missed interrupts and the highest reported latency thus far is >> 61 usec. > > Just Wakeup latency timing , and not latency tracing ? > > Daniel > >
Unfortunately I can't say for sure because I don't remember turning it off, but looking at the log it appears as though latency tracing was turned on
-- kr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |