Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.6.16-rt1 | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:31:28 -0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:10 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Found something interesting. Having Wakeup latency timing turned on > makes a HUGE difference. I turned it off and recompiled and now I am > seeing numbers back in line with what I expected from 2.6.16-rt4. Sorry, > but I had no idea it would make that much difference. I don't have a > complete run yet, but I have seen enough to know that I am not seeing > tons of missed interrupts and the highest reported latency thus far is > 61 usec.
Just Wakeup latency timing , and not latency tracing ?
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |