lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] cpufreq_conservative: update and align of codebase
Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk> wrote:
>
> *NEW* patches, for kernel 2.6.16
>
> Something I had been meaning to do for a while. The codebases between
> ondemand and conservative have strayed and as Venkatesh has far more Clue(tm)
> than I am going to adjust my code to look more like his :)
>
> Another reason to do this is ages ago, knowingly, I did a piss poor attempt
> at making conservative less responsive by knocking up
> DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER by two orders of magnitude. I did fix
> this ages ago but in my dis-organisation I must have toasted the diff and
> left it the way it was. About two weeks ago a user contacted me saying he
> was having problems with the conservative governor with his AMD Athlon XP-M
> 2800+ as /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative showed
> sampling_rate_min 9950000
> sampling_rate_max 1360065408
>
> Nine seconds to decide about changing the frequency....not too responsive :)

umm, that's not really a changelog. Please, see
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt. Section 2a is
relevant too..

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-22 10:28    [W:0.129 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site