Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:22:10 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/4] cpufreq_conservative: update and align of codebase |
| |
Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk> wrote: > > *NEW* patches, for kernel 2.6.16 > > Something I had been meaning to do for a while. The codebases between > ondemand and conservative have strayed and as Venkatesh has far more Clue(tm) > than I am going to adjust my code to look more like his :) > > Another reason to do this is ages ago, knowingly, I did a piss poor attempt > at making conservative less responsive by knocking up > DEF_SAMPLING_RATE_LATENCY_MULTIPLIER by two orders of magnitude. I did fix > this ages ago but in my dis-organisation I must have toasted the diff and > left it the way it was. About two weeks ago a user contacted me saying he > was having problems with the conservative governor with his AMD Athlon XP-M > 2800+ as /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/conservative showed > sampling_rate_min 9950000 > sampling_rate_max 1360065408 > > Nine seconds to decide about changing the frequency....not too responsive :)
umm, that's not really a changelog. Please, see http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt. Section 2a is relevant too..
Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |