![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
At Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:46:34 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > I just noticed this whilst booting 2.6.16 on a test box > > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_read > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_copy_from_user > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_free > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_free > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_ptr_write > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_bzero > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_voice_alloc > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_memblk_map > snd_emu10k1_synth: Unknown symbol snd_emu10k1_synth_alloc > > This kernel was configured with CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1=m > and CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m > > This looks like it can't possibly work, unless I change > CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 to =y. Is exporting a symbol from one > module to another actually supposed to work? > I thought this was why we had the ill-fated intermodule_register() ?. Weird. By modprobe, snd-emu10k1 module should be loaded in prior to snd-emu10k1-synth because of the dependency of above symbols. How is snd-emu10k1-synth module loaded? Takashi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-21 11:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||