![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Út 21-03-06 10:38:52, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 06:13:36PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi!> > > So this patch series simply removes the synchronization in favor of a > > > simple seqlock-like approach using the seconds value.> > > > What about polling RTC from timer interrupt or something like that, so > > that you get error in range of 5 msec instead of 500 msec? You can do > > the calibration in parallel, then...> > I considered that and decided it wasn't worth the effort. People who > care (which ought to be the empty set) can run /sbin/hwclock. Fair enough, hwclock works for me. Pavel -- Picture of sleeping (Linux) penguin wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-21 18:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||