![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 00:58 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 01:23:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > They are the same "delete devfs" patches that I submitted for 2.6.12 and > > 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 and 2.6.15. It rips out all of devfs from the kernel > > and ends up saving a lot of space. Since 2.6.13 came out, I have seen > > no complaints about the fact that devfs was not able to be enabled > > anymore, and in fact, a lot of different subsystems have already been > > deleting devfs support for a while now, with apparently no complaints > > (due to the lack of users.) > > I'm an occasional user. I'm just able to add a config entry by hand. > > Devfs for block devices is required for the fedora core 3 install > kernel. that is not true; Fedora Core 3 does not even have devfs enabled, and neither RHL nor FC has shipped devfsd like forever FC3 uses udev - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-21 08:18 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||