![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Martin Bligh writes: > He's removing KERN_ALERT ... I guess it could get switched from > KERN_ALERT to KERN_ERR, but ... > > Either way, KERN_ALERT seems way too low to me. I object to getting > half the oops, and not the other half ;-) KERN_ALERT is two steps higher in priority (lower number) than KERN_ERR. Why on earth would we see KERN_ERR messages but not KERN_ALERT messages? In fact die() should probably be using KERN_EMERG. Messages without a loglevel are by default logged at KERN_WARNING level, one step lower in priority than KERN_ERR. This all sounds to me like there is something wacky going on somewhere, and we need to get to the bottom of it rather than just remove printk tags. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-02 05:19 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||