![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Russell King wrote: > Nevertheless, my basic point that the no_ioport solution only addresses > one problem area, while being far too late for the other methods still > stands. Agreed. FWIW, as a PCI driver writer I've always wanted a one-call-does-it-all interface, where you pass in a struct that describes * what BARs to map (pci_iomap/ioremap, pci_request_regions) * irq handler (request_irq) * enable bus mastering, MWI (pci_set_master, pci_set_mwi) to collapse the billion-and-one pci_xxx calls into a single one that replaces pci_enable_device(dev) with pci_up(dev, &info). Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-02 20:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||