Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:23:18 +0100 | From | "Jesper Juhl" <> | Subject | Re: Another compile problem with 2.6.15.5 on AMD64 |
| |
On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ? > > It's already fixed in stable. >
Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for 2.6.15.6 (since it obviously isn't in current 2.6.15.5 -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's good.
> > How about mainline ? > > mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad. >
Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git yet). The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the duplicate #include <linux/mempolicy.h> and substitutes it with #include <linux/types.h> those bits would seem to apply to 2.6.16-rc5-mm1
include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm.
-- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |