[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.
    On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:49:53PM -0800, Brown, Len wrote:
    > >sysfs gets it right.
    > >
    > >(23:11:01:davej@nemesis:~)$ ls /sys/devices/system/cpu/
    > >cpu0/ cpu1/
    > >(23:11:07:davej@nemesis:~)$ ls /proc/acpi/processor/
    > >CPU1/ CPU2/ CPU3/
    > This is because the BIOS has three "Processor" objects in the DSDT.

    I have a dual core + HT platform. I disabled HT to have the same situation
    as Dave.

    ACPI DSDT dump shows 4 objects in \_PR scope as below.

    Scope (\_PR)
    Processor (CPU0, 0x01, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
    Processor (CPU1, 0x02, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
    Processor (CPU2, 0x03, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}
    Processor (CPU3, 0x04, 0x00000410, 0x06) {}

    Only 2 are marked enabled in the ACPI MADT..

    From boot log

    ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
    Processor #0 15:4 APIC version 20
    ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x02] enabled)
    Processor #2 15:4 APIC version 20
    ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] disabled)
    ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x03] disabled)

    But proc/acpi/processor also lists just 2 entries.

    [root@araj-sfield-2 tmp]# ls /proc/acpi/processor/
    CPU0 CPU2

    I suspect that the BIOS is goofy and sending a valid acpiid when we try
    to evaluate the processor object.

    Could you see what comes out of the /proc/acpi/processor/CPUx/info for all the
    3 listed in your system?

    Also if you can send DSDT dump just to look over.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-02 17:33    [W:0.022 / U:15.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site