Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 2 Mar 2006 07:53:39 -0800 (PST) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU. |
| |
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:49:53AM -0500, Brown, Len wrote: > > > > I'm afraid that even after we get this stuff out of /proc > > and into sysfs where it belongs, we'll have to leave /proc/acpi around > > for a while b/c unfortunately people are under the impression > > that the path names there actually mean something and > > they can actually count on them -- which they can't. > > Is it possible to obtain the same control/information with sysfs that is > available from /proc/acpi? For example, I use quite extensively CPU > throttling on my VAIO ("cool & quiet home-made mode"), and I was unable to > find the equivalent of /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling ...
I can't help thinking that that should be going through cpufreq. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |