![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Saturday 18 March 2006 19:53, Andrew Morton wrote: > I might stick a once-off WARN_ON() in there so someone gets in > and works out why we keep on having to graft mysterious null-pointer > avoidances into cpufreq. cpufreq_conservative should be marked broken on SMP - I have used it on UP boxes without trouble but I can't even safely modprobe it on SMP - it nearly ate my filesystem. And there seem to be multiple different problems with it - I get different oopses depending upon whether or not I have loaded it before or after the ondemand module. Weird enough - cpufreq_conservative shares much of it's code with cpufreq_ondemand, which works without any problem. Let me know if anyone has objection to marking cpufreq_conservative depends !SMP - I am planning to submit a patch soon. Parag - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-19 07:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||