lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] prepare sysctls for containers
From
Date
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> writes:
> sure, basically we have two cases which interact
> with userspace: the read and the write case.
>
> for the read case, we want something which gives
> us the 'virtualized' view, which might often be
> the same as the host gets, where for the write
> case it is usually not that simple, as we might
> not want a context to write to 'world' stuff
>
> so, having two different functions here, or one
> which gets passed the direction, might be much
> simpler to adjust in many cases than adding more
> and more structures ... but YMMV

I'm not convinced either way yet but my gut feel is that
the use case for get/put functions is incomplete permission
checks on various sysctls.

If that is the fixing the permission checks looks like the
right thing to do.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-19 19:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site