Messages in this thread | | | From | Parag Warudkar <> | Subject | Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative | Date | Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:06:25 -0500 |
| |
On Sunday 19 March 2006 07:00, Alexander Clouter wrote: > Well its drifted a bit, however I submitted a number of patches here about > two weeks ago to bring it back into line and hopefully make it HOTPLUG > safe. > > The new set of patches pretty much make conservative's codebase identical > to ondemands....as no one has posted back having used these or anything > what am I to do?!
The codebase already seems identical to ondemand - Are your patches in 2.6.16-rc6 or -mm? If they are - let me know which. If you posted them but they haven't yet made it into either -mm or mainline can you please post links to all your patches please? I can test them.
Why do we even have conservative and ondemand as two separate modules given they share huge amount of code - perhaps make conservative an optional behaviour of ondemand or alteast make a common lib which both use?
Thanks Parag - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |