![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > > For me, it made a 4970 byte difference in code size. > That's about the same saving as uninlining first_cpu() and next_cpu() provides. Anything which iterates across multiple CPUs is cachemiss heaven - I doubt if this is performance-critical code. Or at least if it is, we have bigger problems.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-19 20:54 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||