![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:57:25AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:56:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > i have released the 2.6.16-rc6-rt7 tree, which can be downloaded from > > > the usual place: > > > > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ > > > > I was wondering, is it normal for the nanosleep02 and alarm02 LTP > > tests to fail? For sometime I've seen these tests fail from time to > > time with the -RT patch but not the regular kernel. > > no, it's not normal. How repeatable is it? With the feb. release of LTP I was 2/2 (./runltp -p -q -l /tmp/run.log -o /tmp/run.out). I've seen it in previous ones as well, and I think I saw it in the one run I did of the March release as well. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-18 12:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||