![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 03:03:40AM -0600, Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:58:22 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote > > Alejandro Bonilla wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a few questions about the PM Dual Core and how could it really work > > > with Linux. Sorry if there are new patches on LKML about any of these things: > > > > > > Could each processor or die, have it's own cpufreq scaling governor? > > > > Sure. On a laptop, if you don't need dual core power, it makes > > sense to turn off the unused core, even. > > > > Jeff > > Jeff, > > For some reason, while I was writing this email, I knew you would be the first > to reply. LOL. Anyway. Does this need new patches sent to LKML or nice > commands to make this work or any idea if stock cpufreqd should manage the > cores separatelly? I haven't got that to work on 2.6.15 so far. How flexible no, currently cpufreqd applies the governor and limits to all available cpus. Is it really possible to run the 2 cores at different speeds? I definitely need to upgrade my hardware and get one of those dual core babies to play with. Oh, and BTW patches to cpufreqd are welcome in the meantime :) ciao -- mattia :wq! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-18 10:50 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||