Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:52:59 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> I ended up with the below. > > Which do we think is more likely to be true - batch_task(p) or > expired_starving(rq)? batch_task() looks cheaper to evaluate so I put > that first. But I guess it's less likely to be true. hmm.
it doesnt really matter - scheduler_tick() is a slowpath. Putting batch_task() first is ok.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |