![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 22:51 +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> writes: > > Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Maybe extending sysrq+n to lower the priority of -20 tasks would be a > >> good idea. > >> > > If it runs before the keyboard thread it doesn't matter... > > Of course not, but that's not generally the case. > > > But why should this hang anything, when there should be enough i/o > > to get out of the user process. There's a good fix for this, don't > > give this guy root any more ;-) > > Ever heard of bugs? Anyone developing a program can make a mistake. > If the program runs with realtime scheduling a bug that makes it enter > an infinite loop (or do something else that hogs the CPU) can be > difficult to find since it rather efficiently locks you out. Given that someone has already determined that installing a safety valve for RT tasks was worth while, and given that there is practically no difference between a nice -20 and the lowest RT priority, seems to me that extending that safety valve to cover reniced tasks is the obviously-correct thing to do. I think you should submit a patch. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-17 06:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||