![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:04:12AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > OK.. I guess we should fix those architectures while we're thinking about it. Only x86 has this bug, so only x86 needs to be fixed. Neverthless Ashok's patch [1] should address all architectures that may implement smp_prepare_cpu() in future as well. > How well tested is this? From my reading, this will cause > enable_nonboot_cpus() to panic. Is that intended? I have done some basic test of the patch using Bryce's scripts. Regarding enable_nonboot_cpus(), from my reading of it, it should not call smp_prepare_cpu on online cpus, so the check added should not cause it to panic. Am I missing something? Finally, I think the patch Ashok posted sometime back [1] is probably a more neater solution to this bug (he probably needs to modify it slightly to remove smp_prepare_cpu from enable_nonboot_cpus as well). [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/17/103 -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-17 15:16 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||