lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 006 of 13] md: Infrastructure to allow normal IO to continue while array is expanding.
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> - retry:
> prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> - sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, pd_idx, (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> + sh = get_active_stripe(conf, new_sector, disks, pd_idx, (bi->bi_rw&RWA_MASK));
> if (sh) {
> - if (!add_stripe_bio(sh, bi, dd_idx, (bi->bi_rw&RW_MASK))) {
> - /* Add failed due to overlap. Flush everything
> + if (unlikely(conf->expand_progress != MaxSector)) {
> + /* expansion might have moved on while waiting for a
> + * stripe, so we much do the range check again.
> + */
> + int must_retry = 0;
> + spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> + if (logical_sector < conf->expand_progress &&
> + disks == conf->previous_raid_disks)
> + /* mismatch, need to try again */
> + must_retry = 1;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> + if (must_retry) {
> + release_stripe(sh);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + }

The locking in here looks strange. We take the lock, do some arithmetic
and some tests and then drop the lock again. Is it not possible that the
result of those tests now becomes invalid?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-17 07:06    [W:0.396 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site