Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:49:32 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu |
| |
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:24:25 +1100 > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>I'm sure that renaming for_each_cpu would not prevent that either. >> > > > But maintainers can check easily whether online or possible should be, > when they received a patch which includes for_each_cpu(). >
The submitter of the patch should have already thought of that regardless of the name of the function. Everybody should be on the same page anyway because for_each_cpu has always meant for each possible CPU.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |