![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:43:38 +1100 > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > >>The only places where things might care is arch bootup code, but >>the cpu interface is such that the arch code is expected to _hide_ >>any weird details from these generic interfaces. >> > > Please see i386 patch. it contains BUG fix. > cpu_msrs[i].coutners are allocated by for_each_online_cpu(). > and free it by for_each_possible_cpus() without no pointer check. > Well that's another problem then, such a fix should not be sent in this patchset, but as a separate patch. > I think this kind of confusion will be seen again in future. I'm sure that renaming for_each_cpu would not prevent that either. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-16 06:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||