![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> > But most importantly, I really don't understand how it is possible to make a > patch to the Linux kernel and not release it under GPL. > If the patch is so ultimatively trivial that there is only a few solutions (one or two), then there is no use in gpl'ing that flock of patchcode, in which case I think, it is (or at best should be) public domain. In conjunction with the patched function, they will/should become GPL. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-03-16 20:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||