lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] for_each_possible_cpu [1/19] defines for_each_possible_cpu
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>>for_each_cpu has always meant for
>> each possible CPU.
>
>
> That was the most long-winded ack I've ever seen ;)
>

Is not! :). This is the very reason why I think it is pointless churn.
There are plenty of functions (even static, confined to a single file,
or ones much more complex than this) which could unquestionably have
their names changed for the better.

This change doesn't even add anything except a redundant element so
it is even questionable that it makes the name better at all.

But I know you've got your heart set on them now so I won't continue
with the impossible task of talking you out of them ;) Just don't
expect that people will suddenly start getting hotplug-cpu races
right, overnight.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-16 16:16    [W:1.209 / U:0.864 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site