Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:10:29 +0100 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? |
| |
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to > >visit the page): > ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile > > A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95, > I would say.
If you would have had a quick look at the results on the webpage you are commenting on instead of blindly speculating, you'd have known that your statement is bullshit since both the 2.4 and the 2.6 compiles were done using gcc 3.3.3.
> Jan Engelhardt
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |