lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
    On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:57:12PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > >
    > >On another denx.de page I found this summary (so you do not have to
    > >visit the page):
    > ># slow to build: 2.6 takes 30...40% longer to compile
    >
    > A side effect of all the new optimizations that went into gcc since 2.95,
    > I would say.

    If you would have had a quick look at the results on the webpage you are
    commenting on instead of blindly speculating, you'd have known that your
    statement is bullshit since both the 2.4 and the 2.6 compiles were done
    using gcc 3.3.3.

    > Jan Engelhardt

    cu
    Adrian

    --

    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-16 00:13    [W:4.277 / U:0.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site